<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NBF 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggbib.net/2006/11/16/nbf-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggbib.net/2006/11/16/nbf-20/</link>
	<description>Bibliotek, bibliotekarer, tanker og meninger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: IFLA 2.0 &#171; Librarian 1.5</title>
		<link>http://bloggbib.net/2006/11/16/nbf-20/comment-page-1/#comment-8244</link>
		<dc:creator>IFLA 2.0 &#171; Librarian 1.5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggbib.net/?p=107#comment-8244</guid>
		<description>[...] Reading Michael Stephens blogpost on ALA 2.0 I started thinking about library organizations and how web 2.0 can improve relations between members and organization and between organization and the world at large. I wrote a post on the Norwegian Library Association (NBF 2.0 - in norwegian) and having slept on the issue came to the conclusion that this was way to narrow thinking. The whole issue with web 2.0 and library 2.0 and hence Library Association 2.0 is that borders no longer count, national organizations are fine from both a social and professional viewpoint, but the real potential lies in the international possibilities that web 2.0 offers. Therefore the title of this blogpost: IFLA 2.0. IFLA, the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions has so far, from where I stand, been an organization for the bigwigs on the national llibrary scene. The director and president of the Norwegian library association, the directors of the lagest academic and public libraries and some people with special skills or papers to present. The membership fee is high and the benefit of becoming a member hard to see unless you have the budget to travel to the annual conferences around the world. This could now change. There is so much to be said for an internationalization of the library association work. I feel that I have more in common with Michael Stephens, Jenny Levine, Karen Schneider, Sukhdev Singh, Bonaria Biancu, and other Librarian 2.0s than I have with a majority of my fellow members of the Norwegian Library Association. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reading Michael Stephens blogpost on ALA 2.0 I started thinking about library organizations and how web 2.0 can improve relations between members and organization and between organization and the world at large. I wrote a post on the Norwegian Library Association (NBF 2.0 &#8211; in norwegian) and having slept on the issue came to the conclusion that this was way to narrow thinking. The whole issue with web 2.0 and library 2.0 and hence Library Association 2.0 is that borders no longer count, national organizations are fine from both a social and professional viewpoint, but the real potential lies in the international possibilities that web 2.0 offers. Therefore the title of this blogpost: IFLA 2.0. IFLA, the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions has so far, from where I stand, been an organization for the bigwigs on the national llibrary scene. The director and president of the Norwegian library association, the directors of the lagest academic and public libraries and some people with special skills or papers to present. The membership fee is high and the benefit of becoming a member hard to see unless you have the budget to travel to the annual conferences around the world. This could now change. There is so much to be said for an internationalization of the library association work. I feel that I have more in common with Michael Stephens, Jenny Levine, Karen Schneider, Sukhdev Singh, Bonaria Biancu, and other Librarian 2.0s than I have with a majority of my fellow members of the Norwegian Library Association. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P 204/06 &#171; Plinius</title>
		<link>http://bloggbib.net/2006/11/16/nbf-20/comment-page-1/#comment-8234</link>
		<dc:creator>P 204/06 &#171; Plinius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggbib.net/?p=107#comment-8234</guid>
		<description>[...] I Fredrikstad fortsetter Siri å skrive sine små essays om barnebøker. “jolifanto bambla ô falli bambla grossiga m&#8217;pfa habla horem”, forteller Hans Petter Laberg. Thomas Brevik poengterer verdien av biblioteket som fysisk sted. På Blogg og bibliotek tenker han høyt, spennende og fornuftig om NBF 2.0: bruk de nye sosiale teknologiene for å realisere organisasjonens målsettinger. For å holde kontakt med digitalfaglige nyheter på bibliotekfeltet er forøvrig bloggen til Magnus Enger i Bodø - Enger 2.0 - enestående. Den fortjener flere lesere. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I Fredrikstad fortsetter Siri å skrive sine små essays om barnebøker. “jolifanto bambla ô falli bambla grossiga m&#8217;pfa habla horem”, forteller Hans Petter Laberg. Thomas Brevik poengterer verdien av biblioteket som fysisk sted. På Blogg og bibliotek tenker han høyt, spennende og fornuftig om NBF 2.0: bruk de nye sosiale teknologiene for å realisere organisasjonens målsettinger. For å holde kontakt med digitalfaglige nyheter på bibliotekfeltet er forøvrig bloggen til Magnus Enger i Bodø &#8211; Enger 2.0 &#8211; enestående. Den fortjener flere lesere. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

